Photo Block Spray to Stop Tickets in the Mail

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Age Loc Nuskin Science

A byproduct of breaking the genome, the age loc product nuetralizes a protein that breaks down the collagen and elastin. The results of age loc are dramatic and immediate. To purchase a galvanic Spa system, click here.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

South Dakota Dark: Welcome to The X-Files Blog-a-Thon!

South Dakota Dark: Welcome to The X-Files Blog-a-Thon!

A closet X-files fan for years. I have gleened a lot of info here dealing with esoteric phenomena.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Junk DNA Was Created by Alien Programmers

This is an article that you should probably re-read several times. 97% of our DNA is said to be created by Alien programmers. There are two codes at work here. A master code for a Superman with a thousand year lifespan and a flawed code for a limited slave race that just digs gold ages fast and is not all that bright.
Ascension Energy- turning on the junk that will make us immortal with Unified field tachnologies.

New findings about “junk DNA” may bring some surprises

A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project will be announcing soon that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called non-coding sequences (97%) in human DNA is no less than genetic code of an unknown extraterrestrial life form.

The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on Earth, from molds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the group leader. Non-coding sequences, also known as “junk DNA”, were discovered years ago, and their function remains mystery. Unlike normal genes, which carry the information that intracellular machinery uses to synthesize proteins, enzymes and other chemicals produced by our bodies, non-coding sequences are never used for any purpose. They are never expressed, meaning that the information they carry is never read, no substance is synthesized and they have no function at all. We exist on only 3% of our DNA. The junk genes merely enjoy the ride with hard working active genes, passed from generation to generation. What are they? How come these idle genes are in our genome? Those were the question many scientists posed and failed to answer – until the breakthrough discovery by Prof. Sam Chang and his group.

Trying to understand the origins and meaning of junk DNA Prof. Chang realized that he first needs a definition of “junk”. Is junk DNA really junk, (useless and meaningless) or it contains some information not claimed by the rest of DNA for whatever reason? He once mentioned the question to an acquaintance, Dr. Lipshutz, a young theoretical physicist turned Wall Street derivative securities specialist. “Easy,” replied Lipshutz. “We’ll run your sequence through the software I use to analyze market data, and it will show if your sequences are total garbage, “white noise”, or there is a message in there.” This new breed of analysts with strong background in math, physics and statistics are getting more and more popular with Wall Street firms. They sift through gigabytes of market statistics, trying to uncover useful correlation between the various market indexes, and individual stocks.

Working evenings and weekends, Lipshutz managed to show that non-coding sequences are not all junk, they carry information. Combining massive database of the Human Genome Project with thousands of data files developed by geneticists all over the world Lipshutz calculated Kolmogorov entropy of the non-coding sequences and compared it with the entropy of regular, active genes. Kolmogorov entropy, introduced by the famous Russian mathematician half a century ago, was successfully used to quantify the level of randomness in various sequences, from time sequences of noise in radio lamps to sequences of letters in 19th century Russian poetry. By and large, the technique allows researchers to quantitatively compare various sequences and conclude which one carries more information than the other does. “To my surprise, the entropy of coding and non-coding DNA sequences was not that different”, continues Lipshutz. “There was noise in both but it was no junk at all. If the market data were that orderly, I would have already retired.”

After a year of cooperation with Lipshutz, Chang was convinced, there is a hidden information in junk DNA. However, how could one understand its meaning if the information is never used? With active sequences you try to watch the cell and see what proteins are being made using the information. This wouldn’t work with dormant genes. There will be experiment to test a hypothesis; one should rely on the power of his thought. Since there are letters, it should be tested in some old languages, perhaps Sumerian, Egyptian, Hebrew, and so on. Prof. Sam Chang solicited help from three specialists in the field, but none of them managed to find a solution. There were no cultural clues, no references to other known languages, the field was too alien for the linguists.

“I asked myself: who else can decipher a hidden message?” Chang continues. “Of course, cryptographers! … exerpted here …. Eventually Prof. Chang was referred to Dr. Adnan Mussaelian, a talented cryptographer in the former Soviet republic of Armenia. Poor fellow barely survived on a $15 a month salary and occasional fees for tutoring children of Armenian nuveau riches. A $10,000 research grant was a struck of luck, he began working like a beaver.

Adnan promptly confirmed the findings of his Wall Street predecessor: The entropy indicated tons of information almost in the clear, it was not too strong cryptographic system, it didn’t appear to be a tough problem. Adnan began applying differential cryptoanalysis and similar standard cryptographic techniques.

He was two months in the project when he noticed that all non-coding sequences are usually preceded by one short DNA sequence. A very similar sequence usually followed the junk. These segments, known to biologists as alu sequences, were all over the whole human genome. Being non-coding, junk sequences themselves, alu are one of the most common genes of all.

Trained as a cryptographer and computer programmer, and having no knowledge of microbiology, Adnan approached the genetic code as of computer code. Dealing with 0, 1, 2, 3 (four bases of genetic code) instead of 0s and 1s of the binary code was a sort of nuisance, but the computer code was what he was analyzing and deciphering all his life. He was on familiar territory. The most common symbol in the code that causes no action followed by a chunk of dormant code. What is that? Just playing with the analogy Adnan grabbed the source code of one his programs and fed it into the program that calculates the statistics of symbols and short sequences, a tool often used in decoding messages. What was the most common symbol? Of course, it was “/”, a symbol of comment! He took a Pascal code, and it were { and } ! Of course, the code between two slashes in C is never executed, and is never meant to be executed; it is not the code, it is the comment to the code!

Being unable to resist the temptation to further play with the analogy, Adnan began comparing statistical distributions of the comments in computer and genetic code. There must be a striking difference. This should show up in statistics. Nevertheless, statistically, junk DNA was not much different from active, coding sequences. To be sure, Adnan fed a program into the analyzer: surprisingly, the statistics of code and comments were almost the same. He looked into the source code and realized why: there were very few comments in between the slashes, it was mostly C code the author decided to exclude from execution, a common practice among programmers.

Adnan, religiously inclined person, was thinking about the divine hand – but after analyzing the spaghetti code inside the sequences he convinced himself that whoever wrote the small code was not God. Who wrote the active, small coding part of human genetic code was not very well organized, he was a rather sloppy programmer. It looked like rather somebody from Microsoft, but at the time human genetic code was written, there was no Microsoft on Earth.

On Earth? It was like a lightning… Was the genetic code for all life on Earth written by an extraterrestrial programmer and then somehow deposited here, for execution? The idea was mad and frightening, and Adnan resisted it for days. Then he decided to proceed. If the non-coding sequences are parts of the program that were rejected or abandoned by the author, there is a way to make them work. The only thing one needs to do is to remove the symbols of comments and if the portion between the /*……*/ symbols is a meaningful routine it may compile and execute! Following this line of thought, Adnan selected only those non-coding sequences that had exactly the same frequency distribution of symbols as the active genes. This procedure excluded the comments in Marcian or Q, whatever it was. He selected some 200 non-coding sequences that most closely resembled real genes, stripped them of /*, //, and similar stuff and after few days of hesitation sent e-mail to his American boss, asking him to find a way to put them in E-coli or whatever host and make them work.

Chang did not replied for two weeks. “I thought I was fired”, confessed Dr. Mussaelian. “With every day of his silence I more and more realized how crazy my idea was. Chang would conclude I was a schizophrenic and would terminate the contract. Chang finally responded and, to my surprise, he did not fire me. He had not bought my extraterrestrial theory but agreed to try to make my sequences work.”

Biologists have attempted for years to make junk sequences express, without much success. Sometimes nothing turned out; sometimes it was junk again. It was not surprising. Grab an arbitrary portion of the excluded computer code and try to compile it. Most likely, it will fail. At best, it will produce bizarre results. Analyze the code carefully, fish out a whole function from the comments, and you may make it work. Because of careful Mussaelian’s statistical analysis 4 of the 200 sequences he selected, began working, producing tiny amounts of a chemical compounds.

“I was anxiously awaiting the response from Chang,” says Dr. Mussaelian. “Would it be a more or less normal protein or something out of ordinary? The answer was shocking: it was a substance, known to be produced by several types of leukemia in men and animals. Surprisingly, three other sequences also produced cancer-related chemicals. It no longer looked like a coincidence. When one awakens a viable dormant gene, it produces cancer-related proteins. Researchers began searching Human Genome Project databases for the four genes they isolated from junk DNA. Eventually, three of the four were found there, listed as active, non-junk genes. This was not a big surprise: since cancer tissues produce the protein, there must be somewhere a gene, which codes it! The surprise came later: In the active, non-junk portion of the code the gene in question (the researchers called it “jhlg1″, for junk human leukemia gene) was not preceded by the alu sequence, i.e. the /* symbol was missing. However, the closing */ symbol at the end of “jhlg1″ was there. This explained why “jhlg1″ was not expressed in the depth of the junk DNA but worked fine in the normal, active part of the genome. The one who wrote the basic genetic code for humans excluded portion of the big code by embracing them in /*… */ but missed some of the opening /* symbol. His compiler seems to be garbage, too: a good compiler, even from terrestrial Microsoft, would most likely refuse to compile such program at all.

Prof. Sam Chang with his students began searching for genes associated with various cancers, and almost in all instances they discovered that those genes are followed by the alu sequence (i.e. protein as a comment closing symbol */), but never preceded by the comment opening /* gene! “This explains why diseases result in cell damage and their death, whereas cancers lead to cell reproduction and growth. Because only few fragments from the big code are expressed, they never lead to coherent growth. What we get with cancer, is expression of only few of genes alien to humans and symbiosis with some genes of bacterial parasites that lead to illogical, bizarre and apparently meaningless chunks of living cells. The chunks have its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs.

“Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various planets. Earth is just one of them. Perhaps, after programming, our creators grow us the same way we grow bacteria in Petri dishes. We can’t know their motives – whether it was a scientific experiment, or a way of preparing new planets for colonization, or is it long time ongoing business of seedling life in the universe. If we think about it in our human terms, the extraterrestrial programmers were most probably working on one big code consisting of several projects, and the projects should have produced various life forms for various planets. They have been also trying various solutions. They wrote the big code, executed it, did not like some function, changed them or added new one, executed again, made more improvements, tried again and again. Of course, soon or later it was behind schedule. Few deadlines have already passed. Then the management began pressing for an immediate release. The programmers were ordered to cut all their idealistic plans for the future and concentrate now on one (Earth) project to meet the pressing deadline. Very likely in a rush, the programmers cut down drastically the big code and delivered basic program intended for Earth. ( insert note here from Dan Winter- remembed when Enki / abRAm / ‘Lucifer’ / EA / Atun – decided to take the Paa Taal in his own sperm and short circuit a few hundred thousand years of Alpha Draconis genetic planning by fertilizing the transplanted Cro Magnon egg into Adam/Eve the gold {powder addiction} mining slaves?)

However, at that time they were (perhaps) not quite certain which functions of the big code may be needed later and which not, so they kept them all there. Instead of cleaning the basic program by deleting all the lines of the big code, they converted them into comments, and in the rush they missed few /* symbols in the comments here or there; thus presenting mankind with illogical growth of mass of cells we know as cancer.”

exerpted here.. “However, from the programmer’s point of view, there is also positive outlook in it. What we see in our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and basic code. First fact is, the complete program was positively not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain evolution; there must be something more in the game. What it is or where it is, we don’t know. (insert note here from Dan Winter – hint – the charge compression of BLISS igniting DNA – BRAIDING LIGHTS UP THE CODONS – to GRAVITY MAKING implosion – this is rebellion politics for Enlil’s Drac government – the original ‘program’ was DNA harvesting like the insurance and banking industry they installed on 300 or so planets – NOT the creation of Star Making DNA – which could overturn the borg Orion empire.. ) The third fact is, no creator of a new work, be it a composer, engineer or programmer, from Mars or Microsoft, will ever leave his work without the option for improvement or upgrade. Ingenious here is, that the upgrade is already enclosed – the “junk DNA” is nothing more than hidden and dormant upgrade of our basic code! We know for some time that certain cosmic rays have power to modify DNA. With this in mind, plausible solution is available. The extraterrestrial programmers may use just one flash of the right energy from somewhere in the Universe to instruct the basic code to remove all the /**/ symbols, fuse itself with the big code (”junk DNA”) and jumpstart working of our whole DNA.

(insert note here: from Dan Winter – The shape of the optics waveguide to generate subcellular organs out of DNA – is called the SUMERIAN ALPHABET – as proven by microscopist George Merkel MD – ‘Sumerian Elixir’ / Chondriana. -also – Scientists have measured that a thread of DNA like a monofilament of gold will become superconductive when zapped with hi amperage at the moment of crystallization.. -. – This is like the function of lightening in “Powder”- the movie, and the function of the (implosion communion fusion producing ) charge collapse process in DNA called {NEAR} DEATH EXPERIENCE – Compare this to the biophysics of KUNDALINI – – which FEELs like lightening and produces the huge microwave cellular (ATP) emissions measured in the microwave- before the predators – from the (Draco shapeshifted) US military decided that technology was ‘a threat to national security’. Finally – notice how all this massive charge compression ambiance completes its necessary fractality (harmonic inclusiveness) – as our Solar maximum (’Rapture”) triggering Galaxy has her ‘Seyfert” burst (cancer preventing – sorts non compressible DNA -OUT – of solar systems like ours – hint to the lo grade shapeshifters {’Dick’ -with the mechanical heart- Cheney} running the US military – your days are numbered ) necessary -orgasm. . Talk about a DNA trigger.. below we suggest to plot the geometry and begin to use spectrum analysis tools to optimize the gravity (”God”) making in our DNA – end insert )

conclusion of above article – That would change us forever, some of us within months, some of us within generations. The change would be not too much physical, (except no more cancers, diseases and short life), but it will catapult us intellectually. Suddenly, we will be in time comparable to coexistence of Neanderthals with Cromagnons. The old will be replaced giving birth to a new cycle. The complete program is elegant, very clever self-organizing, auto-executing, auto-developing and auto-correcting software for a highly advanced biological computer with build-in connection to the ageless energy and wisdom of the Universe. Software wise, within us is either short and diseased life, or potential for a super-intelligent super-being with a long and healthy life. This triggers puzzling questions – was the reduction to the basic code done by sloppy programmers in a rush (as it appears to us), or was the disabling of the big code purposeful act which can be cancelled by a “remote control” whenever desired?”

Soon or later, we have to come to grips with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is not what we think it is. This discovery may well shake the very roots of humanity – our beliefs in our concept of God and in our own power over our destiny…..” end

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Orgone Cellphone Chip Experiment and Plant Growth

Question of proof Orgone cellphone Chips

From time to time we have to don the white coat of the scientist in order to check if what we intuitively feel to be happening can be proven in an objective and repeatable way.
I have often been asked "how do I know that the orgone cellphone chip(or any other orgine-ite tool) works"?

Well, to be honest, until recently I had no really quick answer to that. Basically we relied on the feed back of other alternative healers who had tested the Orgone cellguard with methods like Kineseology and in one case also with dark field mircroscopy. We also surmised that a small orgone chip would work similarly on a small microwave antenna as a much larger TB works on a cellphone tower.
A simple exercise of scaling down. We feel this analogy is legitimate and the effect of TBs on cell phone towers is well documented.

And yet, as we get more and more new customers who have not followed the development of the orgone-ite gifting movement from the beginning, simpler and more direct proof is asked for.

An inspiring precedent Dr. Grünberg had published a very convincing Experiment for testing a different (based on tachyonised material, I think) "radiation neutraliser" for cellphones.

In his experiment, 3 samples of water were prepared. 1 was radiated with 2 cellphones calling each other without any protection. One was radiated with 2 cellphones with the device to be tested. The third sample was kept seperate and not radiated at all.

3 equal samples of sproutable seeds were then watered with the previously prepared water samples.

Interestingly Dr. Grünberg found that the Sample watered with the water that had been radiated with the "protected" cellphones produced better and healthier growth than the totally neutral control sample. Of course this immediately reminded me of the general observation of all all frequent orgone gifters that gifting a cellphone tower (we call them deathforce transmiters) with simple orgone-ite towerbusters transforms that tower into a source of positive orgone energy (POR) thus creating a situation better than simply eliminating the tower.
Plant growth experiments have also been used by many others to demonstrate the effect of orgone-ite.
The reasoning is simple and straight forward: If Orgone does indeed strengtehn the life force, this should show measurable results in plant growth and plant health.

Other plant growth experiments

Many others have used plant growth experiments as a means to demonstrate the efficacy of orgone-ite. The most recent one that got some publicity was conducted by Mr. P Barker from Brighton, England.

It was published in Fortean Times, Issue 249, p24, available at

Mr. Parker, an initially sceptical organic farmer conducted several systematic experiments, comparing the growth of veregtables and sproute in the presence of orgone-ite and without.

To his surprise in all cases he found that the samples exposed to orgone-ite at close range showed much better growth and healthier appearance.

With all these inspiring and encouraging precedents, this is what we did:

14 Nov 2009

Sample 1: tap water was radiated with 2 "unprotected" cell phones for a bit longer than 1/2 hour.

Etheric Water-Tachyon-charged Homeopathic water.

Sample 2: water sample was radiated with 2 cellphones calling each other for a bit longer than 1/2 hour.

In fact I forgot to swith this one off, so we ended up with some 42 minutes on sample 2.

This little oversight would actually make our argument stronger if sample 2 would produce the better results than sample 1 or the neutral control sample.

Sample 3: As it came out of the water tap

The amount of unsprouted check peas was measured in a small espresso cup to ensure all 3 samples would start off the same amount of peas.

All 3 samples were covered in water, approximately 1" or a bit more than 1cm of their respective water sample and left over night. This is the normal sprouting procedure.

15 Nov 2009

Next morning: The samples have soaked up the water and grown considerably in size. From now on all 3 samples would be rinsed in the prepared water every 12 hours approximately (all at the same time).

Again, this is the standard procedure for sprouting. Basically a small amount of water is poured into the glass, the content shaken with the water and then all excess water poured off.

20 Nov 2009

Finalisation of the experiment: the pea sprouts in sample 1 are not happy. about half of them have already started to rot. They feel slimy on touch. It looks as if the volume in the glass is also smaller. Sample 2, the ones sprouted with the water that was raiated with Minishield protected cellphones look healthiest of all 3 despite the fact that the water was radiated 41 minutes and the one in sample 1 only 33 minutes. They definitely look healthier than the control sample that was sprouted with ordinary, untreated tap water. Sample 3 looks reasonably healthy but somewhat lower in volume than sample 2.

I poured the samples out on plates to have a beter visual comparison and then proceeded to weigh them
on a digital kitchen scale.

Sample 1, 148g: note, there are quite a few brown and rotten sprouts already.

Sample 2, 165g: the sprouts look healthy, lots of green shoots and leaves ready to unfurl. The weight is higher (more biomass)

Sample 3, 150g: even though this sample's water has received no cellphone radiation above the normal ambient level, the sprouts are not exceeding sample 2, the one where the water was radiated with the Orgone cell guard protected water. They look healthy but not abundantly healthy and their biomass is only 2 grams more than in sample 1.